25 years: Macroeconomist in banking
According to economic theory, we should not have persistent negative interest rates. The reason: investors – lenders - want a real return for taking the risk of not getting their money back (defaults) and for deferring spending from today to the future. Join Trevor as he briefs us about the history of Interest rates and what impact it can have on the economy.
According to economic theory, we should not have persistent negative interest rates. The reason: investors – lenders - want a real return for taking the risk of not getting their money back (defaults) and for deferring spending from today to the future. Join Trevor as he briefs us about the history of Interest rates and what impact it can have on the economy.
Subscribe to watch
Access this and all of the content on our platform by signing up for a 14-day free trial.
15 mins
Interest rates are the return on lending money or, alternatively, it is the price of money. All savers are lenders - assuming that money is placed in a deposit taking institution, such as a bank, or similar that pays a return for holding those savings. In this video, Trevor discusses negative interest rates.
Key learning objectives:
Understand why we should not have persistent negative interest rates
Outline how pandemics have affected long-term interest rates
Identify how many population demographics explain some of the recent trends of interest rates
Identify the usefulness of negative rates
Access this and all of the content on our platform by signing up for a 14-day free trial.
The reason: investors – lenders - want a real return for taking the risk of not getting their money back (defaults) and for deferring spending from today to the future, thus allowing others the opportunity to use such funds to generate returns.
For the classical economists, the rate of interest is determined by the interaction between the demand for investment capital (the fisherman making a net) and the supply of savings (the friend's surplus fish). There is some so-called 'natural rate' that emanates from the multitude of interactions in an economy that produce a marginal return on the utility of money that equates to the marginal return on investment.
Lower expected future inflation reduces the nominal interest rate demanded for the risk of lending. Say you had a target return of a 3% real rate for lending money for a year, and inflation was expected to be 2%. The nominal interest rate you would demand is 5% to be persuaded to lend. But if inflation falls to zero or below, you will accept 3%, or lower. So, lower future expected inflation means lower interest rates than would otherwise be the case. The reverse is also true.
One silver lining of low long term interest rates at the moment, however, is that it allows government spending to be higher for longer than it would be otherwise.The reason is that the government's cost of funding the deficit is cheaper the lower long term interest rates are. Hence, the government – or more precisely the Debt Management Office - is focused on financing the fiscal deficit at points in the gilt curve that is further out and closest to zero / negative yields.
Access this and all of the content on our platform by signing up for a 14-day free trial.
There are no available videos from "Trevor Williams"