30 years: Equity capital markets
James’ discussion of PPI details its purpose of protecting retail and consumer customers against the risk of nonpayment from a variety of different avenues.
James’ discussion of PPI details its purpose of protecting retail and consumer customers against the risk of nonpayment from a variety of different avenues.
Finance Unlocked is the video learning platform built for finance professionals.
This content is also available as part of a premium, accredited video course. Sign up for a 14-day trial to watch for free.
2 mins 51 secs
Payment Protection Insurance is a product designed to protect a bank’s retail customer base against the risks of non-payment in the case of loss of employment, sickness or disability.
Key learning objectives:
Define PPI and understand the regulation in place regarding it
This content is also available as part of a premium, accredited video course. Sign up for a 14-day trial to watch for free.
Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) is a credit insurance product designed to protect retail and consumer customers against the risks of non-payment of a wide variety of debt in the event of loss of employment, sickness, disability or inability to work.
In the UK, PPI was widely taken out against:
In 2005, the Financial Services Authority, the then UK financial services regulator, took on responsibility for general insurance products. While not all PPI policies were mis-sold, by the following year, the FSA had issued its first fines against PPI providers for mis-selling.
At the same time, buyers started claiming restitution of premiums or compensation on the basis that:
In 2017, the so-called Plevin ruling allowed PPI customers a further channel to claim compensation: if sellers made sales commission in excess of 50% or more of total PPI premiums, but did not disclose this to customers, this contravened the 1974 Consumer Credit Act.
The PPI saga reached a watershed in 2011 when the High Court in judicial review found against the challenge brought by banking lobby group, the British Bankers’ Association, against the FSA and the Financial Ombudsman. The BBA’s complaint was that FSA rules to prevent future mis-selling would be applied retrospectively.
This content is also available as part of a premium, accredited video course. Sign up for a 14-day trial to watch for free.
06:02
13:19
02:59